Those
of you who have not attended a Council meeting at Melbourne Town Hall May wish
to put it on the agenda sometime. It can be an intriguing experience.
Last
night’s Future Melbourne Committee (A special Committee that implements Council
matters) we started off with questions on a very personal sexual harassment
issue which has been in the press recently, moved on to an application for
development of a heritage car showroom up on Elizabeth St. (Yes, car showrooms
have been around long enough to gain heritage status) and then to the issue
that was most relevant to the QVM community - Infrastructure and car parking at
QVM.
For
the QVM matter there was a presentation by city design chief Rob Adams followed
by a number of speakers who are each given 3 minutes to have their say.
Presentations were made by Stan Liacos, Leah Moore, Bruce Pham, Greg Smith,
Matthew Vitale, Paul Ansaldo, and Marshall Waters. It could be said that all
but one of those was positive and supportive of the proposal.
Paul
Ansaldo was supportive of investment but questioned just how logistics were
going to work for Fruit & Vegetable traders. The need for close
consultation with traders was clearly identified in a number of comments
throughout the night.
Bruce
Pham managed to showcase some of his socks as he presented in favour of
spending money on our market. Marshall Waters introduced some mirth as he
compared QVM Renewal with Brexit, and urged that we get on with the job.
“Give
me a shovel”
“Getting
on with the job” was a theme from traders, management and councillors and is
perhaps best encapsulated In Councillor Le Liu’s comment as he urged that we
get the renewal process underway - “Give me a shovel!”
George
Milonas was mentioned for his written submission asking that we "move forward."
There
was clearly lingering disappointment in some quarters that the first proposal
for an underground facility didn’t get across the line. Arron Wood, Marshall
Waters and others considered that was the best for the market in the long term,
but we move on, and it was agreed that the new proposal achieves much of the
same intent for better infrastructure.
Have Your Say - click here.