Much
has been made of the survey conducted to establish trader storage needs. The
results of the survey have guided aspects of the latest renewal proposal which
will be put to Council on Tuesday. But it was what the survey didn’t ask that
is now causing concern.
Traders
were effectively asked what their storage needs were. They were asked to list
their box storage, dry goods and refrigerated needs and predict future needs.
That is fine but they were not asked about their vehicle storage needs. (Note: We
understand there was an option for “Other” storage but few traders would have
associated that with vehicle storage. Perhaps it could have been made clearer.)
Vehicle storage may mean simply parking a vehicle after it has been used to
replenish stock held at an outside location (often home). Or some traders may
use a vehicle as a store of goods during the trading day either on the stall or
nearby.
For
many traders none of this will be an issue. Traders in fixed locations or with
regular delivery arrangements may not have a legitimate need for a stock
vehicle. But if a trader legitimately uses a vehicle to regularly deliver stock
(perhaps to simply replace the previous day’s sales) then there is a vehicle
storage issue.
According
to some attendees at Thursday’s meeting presentation it was suggested that the
market would becomes a vehicle free zone - trader’s vehicles would be parked
elsewhere, away from the market. It should be noted that while we understand the
long term aim of QVM will be to remove vehicles from trading areas, this not a short term or even medium term
priority. Clearly there will be time for QVM to work through issues and find
workable solutions for traders.
The
public is encouraged to use public transport for their shopping needs but
traders generally don’t have that option. Many traders with small trading areas
and set up/pack up arrangements require regular daily top-ups and easy access.
A vehicle is an essential delivery tool for many traders and those vehicles
require easy access parking.
There
will be more to consider on this matter as we move forward.